California

YES: supports borrowing $11.25 billion for income-based housing programs, including help for first-time buyers, farmworker housing, and home loans for veterans

NO: opposes this measure, so the state does not borrow the $11.25 billion for these housing programs

YES: supports letting the rainy day fund grow twice as large, sending more capital gains revenue into it, keeping half of those savings for paying down debt through 2040, exempting money going into savings from the spending cap, and letting the governor declare a budget emergency through the May budget update

NO: opposes this amendment, keeping the rainy day fund’s current size limit, the current spending cap rules, and the separate step for declaring a budget emergency

YES: supports making the higher income tax rates on single filers earning above $361,000 and joint filers above $721,000 permanent, with the money going to K-12 schools and community colleges

NO: opposes this amendment, letting those higher rates expire in 2031 as scheduled

YES: supports lifting the ban on taxpayer-funded campaigns, letting the state, counties, districts, and any city set up a public campaign financing program if it chooses to

NO: opposes this measure, keeping the ban, so only charter cities can use public money to fund campaigns

YES: supports dropping the replacement question from statewide recall ballots, so a recalled office sits empty until the lieutenant governor steps in or a special election is held

NO: opposes the change, keeping the two-part recall ballot, where voters decide both whether to remove the officer and who replaces them

YES: supports creating a state program offering second mortgages to qualified homebuyers through the California Housing Finance Agency, and letting that agency borrow $25 billion to pay for it

NO: opposes this initiative, so the program is not created and the agency does not borrow the $25 billion

YES: supports borrowing $8.4 billion for immune system research, including a new research institute connected to the University of California and grants to public and nonprofit medical research institutions

NO: opposes this initiative, so the state does not borrow the $8.4 billion or create the new institute

YES: supports requiring in-person voters to show a government-issued ID and mail-in voters to provide the last four digits of one when they register, plus requiring officials to keep voter rolls current and make a good-faith effort to verify each voter's citizenship

NO: opposes this initiative, keeping the existing law which says voters are not required to present a government-issued ID when voting and voters must attest to their citizenship under penalty of perjury.

YES: supports a one-time 5% tax on California billionaires’ total accumulated wealth to fund state health care programs, food assistance, and public education

NO: opposes this initiative, so no wealth tax is charged

YES: supports requiring an independent audit of any new special tax before voters approve it and every four years after, and closing the workaround that lets some new state taxes escape the spending cap

NO: opposes this initiative, adding no audit requirement and leaving that workaround open

YES: supports blocking new taxes on what people own (retirement accounts, personal property, savings) and barring retroactive taxes, for taxes enacted after January 1, 2026

NO: opposes this amendment, adding neither rule, so the state could still create taxes on what people own

YES: supports requiring two-thirds voter approval for local special taxes put on the ballot by citizens, canceling property-related taxes that passed under the lower threshold, and stopping charter cities from setting real estate transfer taxes above the state rate

NO: opposes this initiative, keeping the simple-majority threshold for citizen-proposed local special taxes and leaving taxes already passed in place

YES: supports requiring federally qualified nonprofit health centers and look-alike clinics to spend at least 90% of their yearly revenue on things that directly serve their mission

NO: opposes this initiative, setting no minimum share these health centers must spend on their mission

YES: supports speeding up environmental review for projects the law deems essential, with review deadlines, fewer required alternatives, time limits on lawsuits, and limits on what courts can weigh and order

NO: opposes this initiative, keeping the current environmental review process and the current rules for challenging approvals in court